INTEGRATION OF SMED AND TRIZ IN IMPROVING PRODUCTIVITY AT SEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY

Authors

  • Kartik Sreedharaan Kumaresan Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Muhamad Zameri Mat Saman Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

Keywords:

Rapid changeover, semiconductor, test handler, SMED, TRIZ

Abstract

Rapid equipment changeover is a vital driver in enabling a ‘World Class Manufacturing’ organization besides the other core elements of continuous production flow and Lean based activities. With respect to the above statement, a case study on a test equipment changeover was conducted at Intel Technology Sdn. Bhd. The core objective of this study is to reduce the changeover duration by identifying opportunities and enhancing the overall process. Well renowned changeover techniques of SMED were integrated with the problem solving tool called TRIZ to counter problems like non standardized and non optimized practices in the current changeover process. The techniques helped to minimize, substitute or eliminate the changeover activities. Most of the solution focused mainly on task simplification and also hardware redesigning. The changeover process improvement and duration reduction helped the organization mainly in capital and cost savings with other intangible improvements especially in productivity. This case study has helped to demonstrate that though SMED and TRIZ are 2 different techniques with individual strengths and weakness but the integration of these techniques have helped to optimize the changeover process to meet the objective.

References

Moore, G.E. (1965). Cramming more components onto integrated circuits. Electronics Magazine, Vol.38, April 1965.

Lean Learning Centre online at www.leanlearningcenter.com

Levinson, W., & Rerick, R. (2002). Lean Enterprise: A Synergistic Approach to Minimizing Waste. Milwaukee, WI: ASQ Quality Press

Liker, J.K, and Meier, D (2006). The Toyota Way Fieldwork: A Practical Guide for Implementing Toyota’s 4Ps. United States: The McGraw- Hill Companies

McIntosh, R.I., Culley, S.J., Mileham A.R., Owen, G.W (2001). Improving Changeover Performance. Butterworth-Heinemann. Oxford, UK

Farlow, D. (2005). Efficient Line Changeover. SMT magazine, March 2005, 44- 45.

Womack, P.J., Jones, T.D., Roos, D. (1990). The Machine that Changed the World: The Story of Lean Production. New York: Harper Perennial.

Shingo, S. (1984). A Revolution in Manufacturing: The SMED system. Cambridge , MA : Productivity Press.

Karlsson, C., and Ahlsrrom, P.(1996). Assessing changes towards lean production, International Journal of Operations & Production management, 16

(2), 24-41.

Vardeman, S. B.(2010). The Impact of Dr. Shingo on Modern Manufacturing Practices. IE 361. Utah State University.

Kearney, W. (1997). A proven receipt for success: the seven elements of work class manufacturing, National Productivity Review. 16, 67-76.

McIntosh, R.I., Culley, S.J., Mileham A.R., and Owen, G.W. (2000). Critical Evaluation of Shingo’s SMED Methodology. International Journal of Production Research. 38(11), 2377-2395. Taylor and Francis Ltd.

Orloff. M (2003). Inventive Thinking Through TRIZ: A Practical Introduction. Berlin: Springer.

Terninko, Z., Zusman, A. and Zlotin, B. (1998) Systematic Innovation: An Introduction to TRIZ. St. Lucie Press, Boca Raton.

Lev, S. (2009). Introduction to TRIZ. Altshuller Institute Online.

Downloads

Published

2018-04-03

How to Cite

Kumaresan, K. S., & Mat Saman, M. Z. (2018). INTEGRATION OF SMED AND TRIZ IN IMPROVING PRODUCTIVITY AT SEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY. Jurnal Mekanikal, 33(2). Retrieved from https://jurnalmekanikal.utm.my/index.php/jurnalmekanikal/article/view/85

Issue

Section

Mechanical