NUMERICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION OF CALM WATER RESISTANCE AND INTERFERENCE EFFECTS FOR HYDROFOIL-ASSISTED SWATH

Authors

  • Ezzul Hanis Othman Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia,81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Arifah Ali Marine Technology Center, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Adi Maimun Abd Malik Department of Aeronautics, Automotive and Ocean Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • M. Hazmil Shahidy ABDOL AZIS Department of Aeronautics, Automotive and Ocean Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Chee-Loon Siow Marine Technology Center, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Hooi Siang Kang Marine Technology Center, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Adibah Fatihah Mohd Yusof Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia,81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jm.v49.762

Keywords:

hydrofoils, multihull resistance, SWATH, Calm water resistance, interference effect, CFD OpenFOAM

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the interference factor of a conventional Small Waterplane Area Twin Hull (SWATH) vessel with and without the hydrofoils in calm water. While integrating hydrofoils into SWATH designs can reduce wetted surface area and improve hydrodynamic efficiency, it also introduces complex hydrodynamic phenomena and interference effects at the free surface. Conventional methods for calculating interference factors have proven inadequate for hydrofoil-assisted SWATH designs, necessitating a more robust analytical approach. To address this, a modified equation using the resistance coefficient was developed, specifically considering the running wetted surface area of each individual component of the vessel. The methodology involved the construction of a SWATH model featuring passive NACA 0015 hydrofoils in a tandem configuration at the forward and aft ends. Resistance tests were conducted in a towing tank across a range of Froude numbers (Fr) from 0.28 to 0.48, complemented by numerical simulations performed using OpenFOAM to analyze the flow field and wave patterns. A central aspect of this study is the implementation of a new formula for the interference factor that accounts for the dynamic change in the running wetted surface area of the demi-hulls and hydrofoils to improve calculation accuracy. Results indicated that the addition of hydrofoils increased the total resistance coefficient by average 21%. Despite this increase, the hydrofoils significantly improved pitch and heave motions by providing essential dynamic lift. Notably, numerical results identified a zone of beneficial (destructive) wave interference at Fr = 0.38, where overall wave making energy was effectively reduced. The study concludes that hydrofoil-assisted SWATH exhibits a higher interference factor than the bare hull. Furthermore, the findings demonstrate that conventional equations are unsuitable for hydrofoil-integrated multihulls, validating the necessity of the modified resistance coefficient equation introduced in this work.

References

Begovic, E., Bertorello, C., Bove, A., & De Luca, F., Experimental study on hydrodynamic performance of SWATH vessels in calm water and in head waves. Applied Ocean Research, 2019. 85: p. 88-106.DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2018.10.012

Qian, P., Yi, H., & Li, Y., Numerical and experimental studies on hydrodynamic performance of a small-waterplane-area-twin-hull (SWATH) vehicle with inclined struts. Ocean Engineering, 2015. 96: p. 181-191.DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2014.12.039

Wang, J., Zhuang, J., & Su, Y., A study on longitudinal motion stability of a variable-structure SWATH USV with and without twin hydrofoils. Ocean Engineering, 2022. 265: p. 112606.DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.112606

Wang, H.D., Qian, P., Liang, X.F., & Yi, H., Vertical plane motion control of an S-SWATH vehicle with flapping foil stabilisers sailing in waves. Ocean Engineering, 2016. 121: p. 184-195.DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.05.004

Sun, X.S., Yao, C.B., Xiong, Y., & Ye, Q., Numerical and experimental study on seakeeping performance of a SWATH vehicle in head waves. Applied Ocean Research, 2017. 68: p. 262-275.DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2017.09.010

Ali, A., Maimun, A., & Ahmed, Y.M., Analysis of Resistance and Generated Wave around Semi SWATH Hull at Deep and Shallow Water. Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences, 2019. 58(2): p. 247-260

Rahimuddin, R., Seakeeping Performance of Semi-SWATH Ship in Following Sea Using Controlled Fins Stabilizer, in Faculty of Mechanical Engineering. 2013, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

Bi, X., Shen, H., Zhou, J., & Su, Y., Numerical analysis of the influence of fixed hydrofoil installation position on seakeeping of the planing craft. Applied Ocean Research, 2019. 90: p. 101863.DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2019.101863

Kazemi Moghadam, H., Shafaghat, R., & A., H., Foil Application to Reduce Resistance of Catamaran under High Speeds and Different Operating Conditions. International Journal of Engineering, 2019. 32(1)

Migoette, G., & Hoppe, K. Development in Hydrofoil Assistance for Semi-Displacement Catamarans. in Fifth International Conference on Fast Sea Transportation, Seattle, Washington, USA. 1999.

Najafi, A., Aliakbari, T., & Hashemi, S.A., Experimental optimization of hydrodynamic performance of catamarans using hydrofoil element. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment, 2019. 233(2): p. 488-501.DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1475090218761415

Ni, Z., Dhanak, M., & Su, T.-c., Performance of a hydrofoil operating close to a free surface over a range of angles of attack. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 2021. 13: p. 1-11.DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2020.11.002

Putranto, T., & Sulisetyono, A., Lift-drag coefficient and form factor analyses of hydrofoil due to the shape and angle of attack. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 2017. 12(21): p. 11152-11156

Shen, L., Zhang, P., & Li, Y. (2022). Design of hydrofoil for the resistance improvement of planing boat based on CFD. Ocean Engineering, 253, 111275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111275

Suastika, I. K., Wirawan, I. M. A., & Aryawan, I. G. A. K. P. (2022). Resistance analysis of a hydrofoil-supported watercraft (HYSUWAC): A case study. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 1262(1), 012050. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1262/1/012050

Karim, M.M., Prasad, B., & Rahman, N., Numerical simulation of free surface water wave for the flow around NACA 0015 hydrofoil using the volume of fluid (VOF) method. Ocean Engineering, 2014. 78: p. 89-94.DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2013.12.013

Prasad, B., Hino, T., & Suzuki, K., Numerical simulation of free surface flows around shallowly submerged hydrofoil by OpenFOAM. Ocean Engineering, 2015. 102: p. 87-94.DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.04.049

Uddin, M.I., & Karim, M.M., Application of Volume of Fluid (VOF) Method for Prediction of Wave Generated by Flow around Cambered Hydrofoil. Procedia Engineering, 2017. 194: p. 82-89.DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.08.120

Ochi, K.M., Hydroelastic study of a ship equipped with an antipitching fin, in Annual Meeting, Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers. 1961: New York

Ali, A., Effects of Fin Stabilizers Configurations on Semi SWATH Resistance. 2017, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

Najafi, A., Nowruzi, H., Ameri, M. J., & Karami, M. (2021). An experimental study of the wetted surfaces of two-stepped planing hulls. Ocean Engineering, 217, 110445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.110445

Huang, L., et al. (2023). Towards a full-scale CFD guideline for simulating a ship: domain size, boundary conditions and grid sensitivity. Ocean Engineering, 278, 113290.

Guerrero, J., OpenFOAM advanced training. Turbulence Modeling in General CFD and OpenFOAM—Theory and Applications, 2022

Firdhaus, A., Kiryanto, K., Hakim, M. L., Rindo, G., & Iqbal, M. (2024). Ship performances CFD analysis of hydrofoil-supported high-speed catamaran hull form. Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences, 113(1), 108–121. https://doi.org/10.37934/arfmts.113.1.108121

Chun, H.-H., A comparison of hydrodynamic characteristics of single and tandem strut SWATH ships. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea, 1992. 29(3): p. 102-116

Lee, W., & Nam, B. (2024). Numerical Analysis of Wave Interference Effects on Ship Resistance in Parallel Arrangements. (Journal of Ocean Engineering & Technology), 38(6), JOET-2024-082. https://doi.org/10.26748/KSOE.2024.082

Souto-Iglesias, A., Zamora-Rodríguez, R., Fernández-Gutiérrez, D., & Pérez-Rojas, L., Analysis of the wave system of a catamaran for CFD validation. Experiments in Fluids, 2007. 42(2): p. 321-332.DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-006-0244-4

Zaghi, S., Broglia, R., & Di Mascio, A., Analysis of the interference effects for high-speed catamarans by model tests and numerical simulations. Ocean Engineering, 2011. 38(17): p. 2110-2122.DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2011.09.037

Tarafder, M.S., Ali, M.T., & Nizam, M.S., Numerical Prediction of Wave-making Resistance of Pentamaran in Unbounded Water using a Surface Panel Method. Procedia Engineering, 2013. 56: p. 287-296.DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.03.120

Broglia, R., Bouscasse, B., Jacob, B., Olivieri, A., Zaghi, S., & Stern, F. Calm water and seakeeping investigation for a fast catamaran. in Proceedings of the 11th international conference on fast sea transportation (FAST2011), Honolulu. 2011.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-03

How to Cite

Othman, E. H., Ali, A., Abd Malik, A. M., ABDOL AZIS, M. H. S., Siow, C.-L., Kang, H. S., & Mohd Yusof, A. F. (2026). NUMERICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION OF CALM WATER RESISTANCE AND INTERFERENCE EFFECTS FOR HYDROFOIL-ASSISTED SWATH. Jurnal Mekanikal, 49(1), 222–237. https://doi.org/10.11113/jm.v49.762

Issue

Section

Mechanical

Similar Articles

<< < 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.