PREDICTIVE AND RELIABILITY BASED COLLISION RISK AVERSION MODEL FOR INLAND WATERWAYS: THE CASE FREQUENCY ESTIMATION FOR MALAYSIAN LANGAT RIVER
Keywords:
Collision, risk, reliability, frequency, inland waterways, environmental preventionAbstract
Collisions of commercial ships cover the largest part of accidents scenario in waterways. Waterways accidents expose vessel owners and operators, as well as the public to risk. They attract possibility of losses such as vessel cargo damage, injuries, loss of life, environmental damage, and obstruction of waterways. Collision risk is a product of the probability of the physical event its occurrence as well as losses of various nature including economic losses. Environmental problem and need for system reliability call for innovative methods and tools to assess and analyze extreme operational, accidental and catastrophic scenarios as well as accounting for the human element, and integrate these into a design environments part of design objectives. This paper discusses modeling of waterways collision risk frequency in waterways. The analysis consider mainly the waterways dimensions and other related variables of risk factors like operator skill, vessel characteristics, traffic characteristics, topographic, environmental difficulty of the transit, and quality of operator's information in transit which are required for decision support related to efficient, reliable and sustainable waterways developments. 5.3 accidents in 10, 000 years is observed for Langat River, this considered acceptable in maritime and offshore industry, but for a channel using less number of expected traffic, it could be considered high. Providing safety facilities like traffic separation, vessel traffic management could restore maximize sustainable use of the channel.References
Yacov T. Haimes. 1998. Risk Modeling, Assessment and Management. John Wiley & Sons, INC. Canada pp. 159 - 187.
Amrozowicz, M.D. 1996. The Quantitative Risk of oil Tanker Groundings. Master’s degree thesis, Ocean Engineering Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Department of Environment, Modeling and data integration in the study of sediment, 2000, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Kielland, P., Tubman, T., 1994. On estimating map model errors and GPS position errors. Ottawa, Canada: Canadian Hydrographic Service.
DnV. 2001, Marine Risk Assessment, Her majesty stationary office United Kingdom.
Sirkar, J., Ameer, P., Brown, A., Goss, P., Michel, K., Nicastro, F. and Willis, W. 1997. A Framework for Assessing the Environmental Performance of Tankers in Accidental Groundings and Collisions. SNAME Transactions
David Vose, 1996. Risk Analysis – A Quantitative Guide. John Wiley & Sons, INC. canada pp. 67-87.
Fujii Y. 1982. Recent Trends in Traffic Accidents in Japanese Waters. Journal of Navigation. Vol35 (1), pp. 88- 102
Millward, A. 1990. A Preliminary Design Method for the Prediction of Squat in Shallow Water. Marine Technology 27(1):10-19.
John X. Wang. 2000. What Every Engineer Should Know about Risk Engineering and Management. Markel Deker Inc, Switzerland, pp. 112-128.
Lewison, Gr. G., 1978. The Risk Encounter Leading to Collision. Journal of Navigation, Vol 31 (3), pp. 288- 109.
M. Moderras. 1993. What Every Engineer Should Know about Reliability and Risk Analysis. MarkelDeker Inc, Switzerland, pp. 299-314.
DnV, BV, SSPA, 2002, Thematic Network for Safety Assessment of Waterborne Transportation.
PV Varde, ASrividya, VVs Sanyasi Rao, Ashok Chauhan. 2006. Reliability, Safety, and Hazard – Adavnced Informed Technology. Narosa Publishing House, India, PP339.
John McGregor. 2004. (BV report), Pollution Prevention and Control.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright of articles that appear in Jurnal Mekanikal belongs exclusively to Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Penerbit UTM Press). This copyright covers the rights to reproduce the article, including reprints, electronic reproductions or any other reproductions of similar nature.