Dynamic Modeling of Magnetorheological Damper and Force Tracking Using Particle Swarm Optimization

Authors

  • Mat Hussin Ab Talib Department of Applied Mechanics and Design Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia 81310 UTM Johor Bahru Johor
  • Intan Zaurah Mat Darus Department of Applied Mechanics and Design Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia 81310 UTM Johor Bahru Johor
  • Pakharuddin Mohd Samin Department of Aeronautics, Automotive and Ocean Engineering Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia 81310 UTM Johor Bahru Johor

Keywords:

Hysteresis behavior, force tracking control, magnetorheological damper, particle swarm optimization, Spencer model

Abstract

The magnetorheological (MR) damper is the actuator that is typically and recently used to improve the semi active vehicle ride comfort. In this study, the MR damper is investigated in order to capture its hysteresis behavior using the Spencer model. The behavior of the Spencer model is evaluated and validated based on the force-velocity and force-displacement characteristics. The investigation of the MR damper system using the force tracking control (FTC) with particle swarm optimization (PSO) is also conducted to estimate the amount of voltage output produced based on the response of MR damper force and desired control force. It has been demonstrated from simulation that the MR damper system has a good hysteresis behavior of the said characteristics. Also, by implementing the FTC with PSO approach, the proposed MR damper force is able to track the desired force better than the heuristic method for up to 2.47% error considering a given desired input force.

References

Kecik K., Mitura A., Sado D. and Warminski J., 2014. Magnetorheological Damping and Semi-active Control of An Autoparametric Vibration Absorber, Meccanica, 49(8): 1887–1900.

Ahamed R., Rashid M.M., Ferdaus M.M. and Yusuf H.B., 2017. Modelling and Performance Evaluation of Energy Harvesting Linear Magnetorheological Damper, Journal of Low Frequency Noise, Vibration and Active Control, 36(2): 177–192.

Choi S.B., Dong X.M. and Liao C.R., 2008. Fuzzy Neural Network Control for Vehicle Stability Utilizing Magnetorheological Suspension System, Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 20(4): 457–466.

Boada M.J.L., Calvo J.A., Boada B.L. and Díaz V., 2011. Modeling of A Magnetorheological Damper by Recursive Lazy Learning, International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics, 46(3): 479–485.

Mazlan S.A., Ekreem N.B. and Olabi A.G., 2008. An Investigation of The Behavior of Magnetorheological Fluids in Compression Mode, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 201(1–3): 780–785.

Fujitani H., Tomurac T., Hiwatashid T., Shiozakie Y., Hatac K., Sunakodab K. and Mopjshita S., 2003. Development of 400 kN Magnetorheological Damper for A Real Base-Isolated Building, Smart Structures and Materials 2003: Damping and Isolation, 5052(2003): 265–276.

Yao J., Shi W.K., Zheng J.Q. and Zhou H.P., 2012. Development of A Sliding Mode Controller for Semi-Active Vehicle Suspensions, Journal of Vibration and Control, 19(8): 1152–1160.

Khiavi A.M., Mirzaei M. and Hajimohammadi S., 2013. A New Optimal Control Law for The Semi-active Suspension System Considering The Nonlinear Magneto-rheological Damper Model, Journal of Vibration and Control, 20(14): 2221–2233.

Hingane A.A., Sawant P.S.H., Chavan P.S.P. and Shah P.A.P., 2013. Analysis of Semi Active Suspension System with Bingham Model Subjected to Random Road Excitation Using MATLAB/Simulink, IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering, 3(1): 1–6.

Butz T. and Stryk O., 1998. Modelling and Simulation of Electro- and Magnetorheological Fluid Dampers, Math. Mech., 78(1): 1–22.

Ikhouane F., Mañosa V. and Rodellar J.,2007. Dynamic Properties of The Hysteretic Bouc-Wen Model, Systems & Control Letters, 56(3): 197–205.

Spencer B.F., Dyke S.J., Sain M.K. and Carlson J.D., 1997. Phenomenological Model of A Magnetorheological Damper, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 123(3): 1–23.

Kamath G. and Wereley N.M., 1997. A Nonlinear Viscoelastic – Plastic Model for Electrorheological Fluids, Smart Mater. Struct., 6: 351–359.

Wen Y.K., 1976, Method for Random Vibration of Hysteresis Systems, Journal of Engineering Mechanics (American Society of Civil Engineers), 102(2): 249–263.

Bouc R., 1967. Forced Vibration of Mechanical Systems with Hysteresis, Proceedings of The 4th Conference on Nonlinear Oscillation, Prague, 315.

Ikhouane F., Hurtado J.E. and Rodellar J., 2006. Variation of The Hysteresis Loop with The Bouc–Wen Model Parameters, Nonlinear Dynamics, 48(4): 361–380.

Ye M. and Wang X., 2007. Parameter Estimation of The Bouc–Wen Hysteresis Model Using Particle Swarm Optimization, Smart Materials and Structures, 16(6): 2341–2349.

Wu C., Lin Y.C. and Hsu D.S., 2008. Performance Test and Mathematical Model Simulation of MR Damper, The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China.

Zawartka M., 2014. Sensitivity Analysis of The MR Damper Model Parameters on The Vibration Transmissibility Characteristic, Proceedings of the 15th International Capathian Control Conference (ICCC), Velke Karlovice, Czech Republic.

Hudha K., Jamaluddin H., Samin P.M. and Rahman R.A., 2005. Effects of Control Techniques and Damper Constraint on The Performance of A Semi-active Magnetorheological Damper, Int. J. Vehicle Autonomous Systems, 3: 230–252.

Kaveh A., Mohammad A., Share M., and Moslehi M., 2013. Magnetic Charged System Search : A New Meta-heuristic Algorithm for Optimization, Acta Mech., 224(1): 85–107.

Fister I., Yang X.-S. and Brest J., 2013. A Comprehensive Review of Firefly Algorithms, Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, 13(12): 1–13.

Chauhan S., 2016. Optimization of Fuzzy Controller Parameter by Using A Firefly Algorithm, International Journal of Engineering Studies and Technical Approach, 2(3): 53-71.

Luo J., Liu Q., Yang Y., Li X., Chen M. and Cao W., 2017. An Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm for Multi-objective Optimisation, Applied Soft Computing Journal, 50: 235–251.

Zhang Y. and Wu L., 2012. Artificial Bee Colony for Two Dimensional Protein Folding, Advances in Electrical Engineering Sytems, 1(1): 19–23.

Yang X. and Deb S., 2009. Cuckoo Search via L´evy Flights, in Nature & Biologically Inspired Computing, 210–214.

Arora S. and Singh S., 2013. A Conceptual Comparison of Firefly Algorithm, Bat Algorithm and Cuckoo Search, in 2013 International Conference on Control, Computing, Communication and Materials, Allahabad, India.

Kennedy J. and Eberhart R., 1995. Particle Swarm Optimization, in Proceedings of ICNN’95 - International Conference on Neural Networks, 4: 1942–1948.

Ab Talib M.H. and Mat Darus I.Z., 2017. Intelligent Fuzzy Logic with Firefly Algorithm and Particle Swarm Optimization for Semi-active Suspension System Using Magneto-rheological Damper, Journal of Vibration and Control, 23(3): 501–514.

Bai Q. 2010. Analysis of Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm, Computer and Information Science, 3(1): 180–184.

Rashid M.M., Hussain M.A., Rahim N. A. and Momoh J.S., 2007. Development of Semi-Active Car Suspension Control System using Magneto-rheological Damper Model, International Journal of Mechanical and Materials Engineering (IJMME), 2(2): 93–108.

Downloads

Published

2019-05-09

How to Cite

Ab Talib, M. H., Mat Darus, I. Z., & Mohd Samin, P. (2019). Dynamic Modeling of Magnetorheological Damper and Force Tracking Using Particle Swarm Optimization. Jurnal Mekanikal, 41(1). Retrieved from https://jurnalmekanikal.utm.my/index.php/jurnalmekanikal/article/view/319

Issue

Section

Mechanical

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.