DIMENSIONS OF LEARNING ORGANISATION IN MALAYSIAN MANUFACTURING COMPANIES: TESTING MEASUREMENT INVARIANCE AND COMPARING LATENT MEANS

Authors

  • Affandi Mohd-Zainal Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Shari Mohd Yusof Razak School of Engineering and Advanced Technology, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Kuala Lumpur, Level 7, Razak Tower, Jalan Sultan Yahya Petra, 54100 Kuala Lumpur
  • Jane Goodyer Jane Goodyer School of Engineering and Advanced Technology, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand

Keywords:

Learning organisation, organisational learning, measurement invariance, latent mean

Abstract

This paper presents a study on the practice of organisational learning in Malaysia. Specifically, the study investigated the applicability of a learning organisation model, based on the Dimension of Learning Organisation Questionnaire, in the context of Malaysian manufacturing companies. The study also investigated the differences in organisational learning practices between large and small-and-medium sized (SME) manufacturing companies. The study involved the use of Structural Equation Modelling measurement invariance tests and latent mean comparison. Results of study prove that the learning organisation measurement model is equally valid for both large and SME manufacturing companies. The results also show that the practice of organisational learning is more prevalent in large companies than in SME companies. Overall, from practical point of view, Malaysian companies can use the learning organisation model as a tool to measure their current level of organisational learning.

References

Dymock, D. and C. McCarthy, Towards a learning organization?Employee perceptions. The Learning Organization, 2006. 13(5): p. 525-536.

Watkins, K.E. and V.J. Marsick, Sculpting the learning organization: Lessons in the art and science of systemic change. . 1993, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Ortenblad, A., The Learning organization : towards an integrated model The Learning Organization, 2004. 11(2): p. 129 - 144.

Ellinger, A.D., et al., The Relationship Between the Learning Organization Concept and Firms’ Financial Performance: An Empirical Assessment. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 2002. 13(1). p. 5-21

Tsang, E., Organizational learning and the learning organization: a dichotomy between descriptive and prescriptive research. Human Relations, 1997. 50(1): p.73-89.

Li, C.-H., From adaptive to generative learning in small and medium enterprises-a network perspective. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 2016. 6:11. p. 1-12

Yang, B., K.E. Watkins, and V.J. Marsick, The Construct of the Learning Organization: Dimensions, Measurement, and Validation. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 2004. 15(1): p. 31-55.

Watkins, K.E. and V.J. Marsick, Dimensions of the learning organization. 1997: Warwick Rhode Island: Partners for the Learning Organization.

Hernandez, M., The Impact of The Dimensions of The Learning Organization On The Transfer of Tacit Knowledge Process And Performance Improvement Within Private Manufacturing Firms In Colombia, 2000, The University of Georgia.

Haque, M.M., A Study of The Relationship Between The Learning Organization And Organizational Readiness For Change, 2008, Pepperdine University.

Lien, B.Y.-H., et al., Is the learning organization a valid concept in the Taiwanese context? International Journal of Manpower, 2006. 27(2): p. 189 - 203.

Vogt, W.P., Dictionary of statistics & methodology: A nontechnical guide for the social sciences 2nd ed. 1999, Thousand Oak, CA: Sage Publications

Byrne, B.M., Structural Equation Modeling With AMOS : basic concepts, applications and programming. 2001, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Brown, T.A., Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research, 2006. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

Byrne, B.M., R.J. Shavelson, and B. Muthen, Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: the issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 1989. 105: p. 456-466.

Dimitrov, D.M., Comparing groups on latent variables. Work, 2006. 26: p. 429-436.

Song, J.H., B.-K.B. Joo, and T.J. Chermack, The dimensions of learning organization questionnaire (DLOQ): A Validation Study in a Korean Context. Human Resource Development Quarterly 2009. 20(1). p. 43-64

Zhang, D., Z. Zhang, and B. Yang, Learning organization in mainland China: empirical research on its application to Chinese state-owned enterprises International Journal of Training and Development, 2004. 8(4). p. 258-273

Leufvén, M., et al., Dimensions of learning organizations questionnaire (DLOQ) in a low-resource health care setting in Nepal. Health Research Policy and Systems, 2015. 13:6. p. 1-8

Hu, L. and P.M. Bentler, Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 1999. 6(1): p. 1-55.

Wyer, P., J. Mason, and N. Theodorakopoulos, Small business development and the "learning organisation" International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 2000. 6(4): p. 239-259.

Saleh, A.S. and N.O. Ndubisi, An evaluation of SME development in Malaysia International Review of Business Research Papers 2006. 2(1): p. 1 - 14.

Downloads

Published

2018-04-01

How to Cite

Mohd-Zainal, A., Mohd Yusof, S., & Jane Goodyer, J. G. (2018). DIMENSIONS OF LEARNING ORGANISATION IN MALAYSIAN MANUFACTURING COMPANIES: TESTING MEASUREMENT INVARIANCE AND COMPARING LATENT MEANS. Jurnal Mekanikal, 38(2). Retrieved from https://jurnalmekanikal.utm.my/index.php/jurnalmekanikal/article/view/24

Issue

Section

Mechanical

Similar Articles

1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.