Behavior and Characteristics of Rubber Blade Car Perform

Authors

  • S.M. Mohamad School of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor
  • N. Othman School of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor
  • I. Sharif School of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor
  • M.Z. Md. Zain School of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor
  • A.R. Abu Bakar School of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor

Keywords:

Contact force, noise, wiper blade, vibration, test rig

Abstract

In this modern day, high technologies have contributed so much in improving and
optimizing the engine design and performance of the car. Improved isolation has helped to
minimize the engine noise by making other automotive part noises become more detectable.
One of the noise sources are from the wiper blades. When a wiper operates on a windshield,
it often results in vibratory phenomenon due to flutter instabilities and may in turn generate
squeal noise. In order to obtain good wiping characteristics, the rubber blade should be in
complete contact with the glass and under uniform contact pressure while not generating
vibration as it moves over the glass. A good wiping performance can be achieved by a
proper design of the wiper structure as well as a good understanding of the mechanical
behavior of the rubber blade. The primary objective of this research is to study the behavior
and characteristics of rubber wiper blade performance in order to reduce the automotive
windscreen wiper noise and vibration effects. Experiments confirm that the contact force
distribution between the rubber blade and glass is limited to a set of fixed locations that
normally produce such characteristics of the wiper rubber blade due to environmental
conditions such as humidity, temperature and wiper stiffness. Therefore, the experimental
results were compared with previous studies and the data analysis has been used
throughout the study and clearly demonstrates that it is achievable.

References

Denso International Product. Co., Wiper Technical Information,

www.denso.sg/tpl/pdtlineup_wiper_technicalinfo.html, [Accessed: 24 September 2018].

Unno M., Shibata A., Yabuno H., Yanagisawa D. and Nakano T., 2017. Analysis of The Behavior of A Wiper Blade Around The Reversal in Consideration of Dynamics and Static Friction, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 393: 76-91.

Grenouillat R. and Leblanc C., 2002. Simulation of Mechanical Pressure in A Rubber-Glass Contact for Wiper Systems, SAE Technical Paper, 2002-01-0798.

Awang I.M., Abu Bakar A.R., Ghani B.A., Rahman A.R. and Zain M.Z.M., 2009. Complex Eigenvalue Analysis of Windscreen Wiper Chatter Noise and Its Suppression by Structural Modifications, International Journal of Vehicle Structures & Systems, 1(1-3): 24-29.

Koenan A. and Sanon A., 2007. Tribological and Vibro Acoustic Behavior of A Contact Between Rubber and Glass: Application to Wiper Blade, Tribology International, 40(10–12): 1484-1491.

Grenouillat R. and Leblanc C., 2002. Simulation of Chatter Vibrations for Wiper Systems, SAE Technical Paper, 2002-01-1239.

Cadirci S., Selenbas E. A-K.B., Gunes H., 2017. Numerical and Experimental Investigation of Wiper System Performance at High Speeds, Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics, 10(3):861-870.

Lee S.H., Kim Y.H., Sung J., Shin K.C., Oh J.H., 2013. Investigation of The Contact Force Distribution and Dynamics Behaviour of An Automobile Windshield Wiper Blade System, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automotive Engineering, 227(7): 1040-1052.

Jallet S., Devos S., Maubray D., Sortais J-L., Marmonier F. and Dreher T., 2001. Numerical Simulation of Wiper System Aerodynamic Behavior, SAE Technical Paper, 2001-01-0036, SAE 2001 World Congress Conference, Detroit, Michigan, USA.

Goto S., Takahashi H. and Oya T., 2001. Clarification of The Mechanism of Wiper Blade Rubber Sequel Noise Generation, JSAE Review, 22(1): 57-62.

The different types of wiper blades explanation, http://www.wiperblades.co.uk/wiperblade-types/, [Assessed: 8 October 2018].

Zhang L. 2010. Experimental Investigation into Friction Induced Noise of Automotive Wiper System, SAE Technical Paper, 2010-01-0749.

Fuji Y. and Yamaguchi T., 2007. Dynamic Characteristics Measurements of a Car Wiper Blade, JSME International Journal Series C, 49(3): 799-803.

Chevennement-Roux C., Dreher T., Alliot P., Aubry E., Lainé J-P. and Jézéquel L., 2007. Flexible Wiper System Dynamic Instabilities: Modelling and Experimental Validation,Experimental Mechanics, 47(2): 201-210.

Shun C.C and Hai P.L., 2004. Chaos Attitude Motion and Chaos Control in An Automotive Wiper System, International Journal of Solids and Structures, 41(13): 3491-3504.

Downloads

Published

2019-05-15

How to Cite

Mohamad, S., Othman, N., Sharif, I., Md. Zain, M., & Abu Bakar, A. (2019). Behavior and Characteristics of Rubber Blade Car Perform. Jurnal Mekanikal, 41(2-S). Retrieved from https://jurnalmekanikal.utm.my/index.php/jurnalmekanikal/article/view/339

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.